How reliable are portable HDs these days?
|
| Post date: 2024-04-26 03:03:30 |
| Views: 16 |
I have four large (but not full) hard drives on my desk that are getting old--two 4TB and two 3TB (one of each pair is a backup for the other). One drive holds media files and the other my Lightroom library. Given technology developments, I could fit all of my data on a single 5TB portable drive (I'd get a second for backups). Is this a bad idea, and should I just stick with desktop drives if I don't actually need a portable drive?
Both Seagate and WD have 5TB portable drives for less than $125 (I don't have a strong feeling about either--my 4tb drives are WD, and the 3tb are Seagate).
If I don't need the convenience of actually taking the portable drives anywhere, should I just get a desktop drive?
It's hard to tell the drive specs other than being USB3.0--would you anticipate any usability issues with these drive for light photo editing and streaming media locally? Thanks! |
| Please click Here to read the full story. |
| |
| Other Top and Latest Questions: |
Trump's 'No tax on tips' could be end of large-group service fees on restaurant bills
|
34-year-old was saving to buy a house, then decided to focus on early retirement instead: 'I value my time more than home ownership'
|
Top 10 trending destinations for U.S. travelers in 2026: 'Americans are discovering their own backyard,' expert says
|
Bank of America says Domino’s Pizza is among the most likely M&A candidates
|
Trump tells Senate Republicans to send federal health insurance money 'directly to the people'
|
Week in review: The Nasdaq's worst week since April, three trades, and earnings
|
Boeing keeps up strong delivery pace in October
|
Defense spending isn't going away any time soon. This stock on our list has a pristine chart
|
How 20-year-old Kenyan student turned a local fundraiser into nonprofit serving 600,000 meals a day
|
AI spending is not all equal. Wall Street rewards hyperscalers, punishes DoorDash and Duolingo
|