How reliable are portable HDs these days?
|
| Post date: 2024-04-26 03:03:30 |
| Views: 25 |
I have four large (but not full) hard drives on my desk that are getting old--two 4TB and two 3TB (one of each pair is a backup for the other). One drive holds media files and the other my Lightroom library. Given technology developments, I could fit all of my data on a single 5TB portable drive (I'd get a second for backups). Is this a bad idea, and should I just stick with desktop drives if I don't actually need a portable drive?
Both Seagate and WD have 5TB portable drives for less than $125 (I don't have a strong feeling about either--my 4tb drives are WD, and the 3tb are Seagate).
If I don't need the convenience of actually taking the portable drives anywhere, should I just get a desktop drive?
It's hard to tell the drive specs other than being USB3.0--would you anticipate any usability issues with these drive for light photo editing and streaming media locally? Thanks! |
| Please click Here to read the full story. |
| |
| Other Top and Latest Questions: |
How surprise year-end income could derail your tax strategy — and how to plan for it
|
This Google exec became a boss 'overnight' 20 years ago—the most important lesson he's learned as a manager
|
5 last-minute ways to clear credit card debt before the new year, using everyday money tools
|
Korea Zinc sinks 14% as largest shareholder group challenges U.S.-backed plans for Tennessee smelter
|
Startup backed by Altman, JPMorgan announces capital lending partnership with Amazon
|
Payrolls rose by 64,000 in November after falling by 105,000 in October, delayed jobs numbers show
|
Kevin Warsh moves ahead in Fed chief race on Kalshi after Hassett pushback
|
Consumers are feeling gloomy about the economy. Here's why they're spending anyway
|
Robotaxis in 2025: Waymo plots global expansion as Zoox, Tesla roll to the starting line
|
Hassett says Fed independence is ‘really important’ and chair candidates shouldn’t be disqualified for being Trump’s friend
|