How reliable are portable HDs these days?
|
| Post date: 2024-04-26 03:03:30 |
| Views: 23 |
I have four large (but not full) hard drives on my desk that are getting old--two 4TB and two 3TB (one of each pair is a backup for the other). One drive holds media files and the other my Lightroom library. Given technology developments, I could fit all of my data on a single 5TB portable drive (I'd get a second for backups). Is this a bad idea, and should I just stick with desktop drives if I don't actually need a portable drive?
Both Seagate and WD have 5TB portable drives for less than $125 (I don't have a strong feeling about either--my 4tb drives are WD, and the 3tb are Seagate).
If I don't need the convenience of actually taking the portable drives anywhere, should I just get a desktop drive?
It's hard to tell the drive specs other than being USB3.0--would you anticipate any usability issues with these drive for light photo editing and streaming media locally? Thanks! |
| Please click Here to read the full story. |
| |
| Other Top and Latest Questions: |
HPE CEO Neri pleased with quarter despite AI revenue delays as stock bounces from post-earnings dip
|
Elon Musk’s X fined $140 million by European Commission over 'deceptive' blue checkmark and lack of transparency
|
Apple announces departure of general counsel and policy chief
|
Social Security changes on the table as House bills advance: New retirement age terms, more ID theft services
|
Netflix to buy Warner Bros. film and streaming assets in $72 billion deal
|
$208 million wiped out: Yieldstreet investors rack up more losses as firm rebrands to Willow Wealth
|
Tokenized stocks offer new opportunities for investors, but carry unique risks
|
Stocks making the biggest moves midday: Paramount Skydance, Rubrik, Netflix, Parsons, Albemarle and more
|
Core inflation rate watched by Fed hit 2.8%, delayed September data shows, lower than expected
|
RFK Jr.’s vaccine panel weakens recommendation on hepatitis B shot for babies, scrapping universal guidance
|