Numbers seeking function

Post date: 2024-04-14 15:02:54
Views: 139
For some of my smaller spaces I want to offer design by the square metre and enable my clients to work out my fee*, which will hopefully help them to pick up the phone. The aim is to present people with a simple function so they can do it themselves, e.g. if they've got say 225 square metres what will that cost them? I'm hoping to find something people as non-numeric as myself can punch into a calculator: area operation number operation number = $number

For the smallest area of 100m² that $2717 would work for me (17 hours @ $160 an hour) and maybe a bit less than that say as low as 14 hours], and for 300m² (the largest area) fee would be $3680 (23 hours @ $160 an hour). But those numbers are artificial (from experimenting with Excel solver to arrive at acceptable sums) and I can't get them with the same function, I don't think the answer is linear.

I do want them to be aable to enter a measure area, I'm not looking for a tiered fee structure.

*I've asked about this on ask me years ago but I now need something quite different, as my upper and lower bounds are not calculated, they are simply what I feel are acceptable charges for the work.
Please click Here to read the full story.
 
Other Top and Latest Questions:
Kalshi traders think the bitcoin rally could end the year near current levels
Energy sector is in focus because of Iran, AI and California. Here are hedge funds' top plays
Accordia Bank is offering a 5.00% APY booster on high-yield savings account for its rebrand — how to get it
International student enrollment falls amid tighter U.S. visa policies, reports show
Answered: The content and articles of my q2a site are being pulled by fake sites. Can you help me to solve this problem?
Book: The Lives Of The Muses: Nine Women & the Artists They Inspired
Book: Listen to Your Sister by Neena Viel
Ted Lasso: Richmond's Got Talent
The Bombing of Pan Am 103: The Bombing of Pan Am 103 (all episodes)
Dow surges 500 points Friday, but index posts back-to-back weekly losses