Tesla battery pack capacity confusion

Post date: 2022-08-10 04:16:12
Views: 140
I'm confused about the Tesla battery pack specifications. My understanding is that when you add cells in series their overall capacity stays the same - it's only when you add them in parallel that you add the capacities. But the spec seems to be as if the modules that make up the pack are both in series and in parallel! Maths below the fold.

A Tesla module contains 6 series x 74 parallel 18650 cells. This gives 6 x 3.7V = 22.2V total, and 74 x 3.4Ah x 22.2V = 5.6 (rounded)kWh capacity. So far, so good! My calculations match the specs.

16 modules are wired in series to create the battery pack. I'm confused because the total capacity is given as 89-90kWh. This is 16 x 5.6 (89.6) but that would only work if the modules were connected in parallel! If they are in series then isn't it still 5.6kWh?

What am I missing here? I'm guessing it's to do with the configuration within the modules? Or just some weirdness in how the specs are given?

(This is to satisfy my curiosity, no actual battery use is intended. I don't even own a Tesla.)
Please click Here to read the full story.
 
Other Top and Latest Questions:
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway nailed the timing on Alphabet — whether by design or not
Student loan borrowers have 'a limited time' to leave payment pause. Here are their options
Southwest CEO says airline 'actively pursuing' network of airport lounges
Strategy slams MSCI proposal to exclude digital asset treasuries from indexes: CNBC Crypto World
‘Greetings, earthlings’: Nvidia-backed Starcloud trains first AI model in space as orbital data center race heats up
Trump admin touts pulling nearly 10,000 truckers off road for failing English tests
Teachers' union AFT slams crypto market bill, warns of 'profound risks' for America's retirement plans
Cisco's stock closes at record for first time since dot-com peak in 2000
S&P, Nasdaq futures lower as Oracle results fail to stoke AI trade: Live updates
Why the stock market rallied so much on the Fed. Time to bet on a year-end melt up?