F&*king Pregnancy Tests, How Do They Work?
|
| Post date: 2021-05-06 23:21:18 |
| Views: 137 |
I understand, or at least I think I understand, how pregnancy tests work in a general sense. What I don't get is why they're all labeled as being accurate within a certain number of days before or after you either "expect" or "miss" your period. I would like someone to explain to me why the tests' effectiveness depends on where you are in your menstrual cycle rather than how long it's been since you conceived.
This is partly idle curiosity and partly relevant to my life and anxieties. I have an irregular, often abnormally long (about 6 weeks on average) menstrual cycle and a (recent, traumatic) history of ectopic pregnancy. As a result, I spend a lot of time each month uncertain whether I have missed my period or am just still waiting for it. During this time, I sometimes take a pregnancy test out of an abundance of caution.*
Is the test pretty much guaranteed to give me a negative result every time because it's been less than my average length of cycle since I last menstruated? Or is it possible for it to give a positive result, if I were pregnant, four weeks after my last period? Or is there another answer? Why is the answer what it is?
Answers from people with OB/GYN or endocrinological background especially appreciated, but I'm open to as many explanations as I can get my grubby hands on.
Thank you in advance for helping me understand what's going on with the little pieces of paper I might be peeing on in vain!
*I am on the best birth control method available to me, and it has already failed me once, resulting in the aforementioned ectopic pregnancy. It also increases my risk of ectopic pregnancy in general, so I'm very concerned about catching any pregnancies as early as possible to reduce the risk of life-threatening complications. |
| Please click Here to read the full story. |
| |
| Other Top and Latest Questions: |
China consumer prices return to growth in October, producer price slump extends to three years
|
People with ADHD, autism, dyslexia say AI agents are helping them succeed at work
|
Baby boomers are less bullish on ETFs than younger generations, research finds — with good reason
|
Experts caution against Trump’s 50-year mortgage. How to boost a traditional home loan’s affordability
|
AI spending is not all equal. Wall Street rewards hyperscalers, punishes DoorDash and Duolingo
|
Rocket Lab rises 5% on record third-quarter revenue, launch backlog
|
Senate passes bill to end government shutdown, sending it to House
|
Paramount Skydance reported its first earnings as a combined company. Wall Street wasn’t impressed
|
Nasdaq falls as tech shares come under pressure again; S&P 500 is little changed: Live updates
|
'Big Short' investor Michael Burry accuses AI hyperscalers of artificially boosting earnings
|